Recently, Google announced a new desktop ad placement where certain right-side ads will move to the bottom of the search engine results page (SERP). Based on user experience per query, Google may push some right-side ads to the bottom (the number of ads on the SERP will not change). Currently, bottom ads only show for queries with fewer ads. This change only applies to Google.com (not the Search Partner Network). It also doesn’t apply to Google mobile search, which already features bottom ad placements. Advertisers cannot opt-out of bottom ads.
It’s possible that—based on the query—your lower right side ad could be pushed to the bottom. But this isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Google has utilized Eyescan research to determine that searchers’ eyes direct to the center of the page, rather than to the right side. In testing, Google has found that bottom ads have comparable click-through rates (CTRs) as right-side ads.
The point is that ad performance must be continually evaluated and optimized based on balancing visibility and budget, and falling into the bottom ads may be the optimal position in some situations. In other situations, bids may have to be increased to avoid the bottom. In the coming weeks, Performics will pay close attention to abnormalities in CTRs for lower ranking ads.
Impact on the Organic Search Experience
Bottom ads won’t impact how organic results are determined. Google has also stated that bottom ads will be easily distinguishable from organic listings due to the background color and “Ad” label. But—even if searchers are able to easily distinguish bottom ads from organic listings—bottom ads could change the organic page experience.
Essentially, bottom ads make page one of the SERP longer. This makes first-page search visibility more critical. For instance, searchers who are focused on the center column need to scan more listings before moving to page two. Of course, this is already true in relation to queries that feature top-sponsored ads, but searchers are conditioned to top-sponsored ads. Searchers aren’t conditioned to bottom ads; they may spend slightly more time focused on page one’s center column as they scan past the organic listings to the bottom ads. By the time a user has scrolled to the bottom of the page, the top ten organic results haven’t provided links that satisfied the query. Therefore, at the bottom of the page, the user may be more open to reading the copy of an ad, considering the organic results haven't been helpful. Searchers may notice bottom ads when they never would have noticed those ads had they served on the right side. Instead of moving to page two, searchers may click on the bottom ads. Thus, bottom ads may cannibalize organic clicks from page two.
As bottom ads become more common, Performics will pay close attention to page-two organic CTRs.
Mike, thanks for the great coemmnt. There is no comparison on quality of the lead. People are further down the buying cycle, and, on average, mobile leads are higher in quality. Fewer price shoppers, people gathering info, etc.; however, while mobile is growing rapidly, there is not the volume of search available compared to desktop. For example, an average SMB looking to spend up to $3k within a 25- to 50-mile radius will have no issue. But mobile advertising will struggle to provide the quantity of leads that an SMB may receive from desktop search beyond this level of spend. Obviously, the range of spend is different among segments. The spend targets will expand as mobile search continues to grow.
Posted by: Habe | May 12, 2012 at 07:08 AM